The September 11 tragedy had really put a big scar unto the relationship between Muslim and non-Muslim people at the west civilization. As soon as it happened, the media had played a crucial role on promoting the Islamic icon ' Osama' as the man in charge on the programme to destroy the American people. Although he had denying it over and over again, the media keep showing his face as the guilty person that represent Islam although not a single trial had be done to prove such accusation. However, there had been skeptical rumors that started long ago, just after the incident happened, claims that something seems wrong about that tragedy. A number of years ago some people on the net had been spreading the idea that the event was part of a big conspiracy. The rumours had been told from one person to another and thanks for the Internet, finally now it wasn't a secret anymore. As we go through, we will examine 10 evidence about the proof that pre-planned bomb was involved in WTC and Pentagon cases.
The proof that will be discuss is proof by witnesses, proof by the picture before impact, proof by the theory of early collapse, proof by the theory of high speed collapse, proof by the theory of minimal burning, proof by the theory of phyroclastic ash, proof by the image of temperature map, proof by the picture of less damage, proof by the contrary statement by the witnesses and proof by the facts of invisible plane.
First of all, lets us consider the statement of majority of the witnesses in that event. Most of them agree that a huge explosion had occurred before the twin tower collapse. This statement had been recorded by many sources from a single person to the live news proggramme including CNN and BBC that had been on air live on that event. It is a big probability that the sound comes from the enormous bomb explosion that had been detonated to destroy the main pillars that hold the solid structure. That is one of many evidence that shows us the building had been planted bomb earlier.
The second point is there are several pictures captured by many sources showing there was a premature explosion just before the plane hit the twin tower. Government supporters try to explain that was a static release. But need to be told here, static sparks would only visible in certain angle and appears as a lightning flash, which is totally different from the image in the picture. Surely the picture showed us that a typical explosion occurred before the impact. Now we will move to the next evidence.
Third, the deceit can be prove by the theory of early collapse. The time gap 3-5 hours between the crash and the collapse was too short to be possible. The fire had lack of time to destroy the bone which holds the building structure that make it impossible to collapse it in such incident. There was a similar case before where one skyscraper still holds on even it had been burning for almost complete 24 hours. Now, proceed to another point.
The forth evidence is the proof by the theory of high-speed collapse. The collapse of both twin tower happened too fast, as what usually happen in pre-planned building destruction by an expert demolition man. Considering the buildings holds up to 110 story's, with the assumption every story has strong designed floor that can slowed the momentum to one second for each level, it should had fall in approx 110 seconds, not 8.4 which is the exact time if we throw a chair from the WTC roof top all the way to the bottom without any obstacle. The government showed no interest to explain this! Lets move deeper.
The fifth evidence is the proof by the theory of minimal burning. Taken from many recorded items, we could observe jet fuel quickly evaporated after the impact, which logically left fewer elements for the fire to keep burning the fireproof office tools. Pictures of couple survivors standing near the crush hole, the black smoke which means low oxygen, poor burning, minimal flame, proving that the fire doesn't have enough capacity to melt down the hardened steel which is used as the building pillar.
The sixth evidence is the proof of phyroclastic ashes. How come the stone, bricks, office furniture turn almost completely into ashes without interference of a bomb? Only high power detonation device could produce such fine ash. Still, once more the government doesn't seems to explain such anomaly. Now, relating to the earlier point where the building only had a minimal burning, lets look up to the contrary proof that will be discuss next.
The seventh point tells us that there is a proof by an aerial image of temperature map. Since there is many concrete evidence that only a small, under control fire occurred in both towers, the high tech heat sensors camera capture at least 5 hot spots many days after the great falls which exceed the burning point of an aluminum, or approximately 1200 Fahrenheit. This fact tells us none but there had been a high power bomb detonation since only bomb can reach such heat to burn solid metal. No wonder the building collapse so quick, fast and left such catastrophic destruction.
Entering the eighth point, we shall look at the proof that had been taken from the incident at the Pentagon. There was a concrete proof by the picture of less damage. The deceit is so obvious, even a child can tell it. Government claims that a hijacked passenger plane made the crush, which is approximately 135 feet in length. In the mean time, the hole that had been produce by the impact is many feet short than the actual plane size. What is happening here? That is one of the most obvious evident that had been discovered so far.
The ninth point is proof by the contrary statement by witness. A recorded interview had been made, claims that the plane is far more smaller than a passenger aircraft, it is more like a commuter jet, shining, or at least white in color. Is it American government lying on us? There are also only few pictures about the crush, or should I say it is more like a blast, and no single aircraft, whatsoever are captured in film although there were many close circuit television recording 24 hours in that extremely guarded area. How come this can be true? This is only possible only if the plane is magic ghost plane. The following argument also shows us about the unseen plane.
The tenth point is the proof by the facts of invisible plane. After the crush, there are no single part of so-called aircraft is visible anywhere at the scene. Logically at least the tail or the wing of the aircraft is being thrown after the impact, but nothing was found. So what we could assumed is whether the explosive material in the plane had destroy all of the evidence or the remaining part of the plane had quickly been transferred to other places to hide it so that nothing is left for investigation. Now we had reached the end of all the point.
So far we had discuss about the proof by witnesses, proof by the picture before impact, proof by the theory of early collapse, proof by the theory of high speed collapse, proof by the theory of minimal burning, proof by the theory of phyroclastic ash, proof by the image of temperature map, proof by the picture of less damage, proof by the contrary statement by the witnesses and proof by the facts of invisible plane. It can be assumed that many of the proof are so strong that we cannot take it easily and something has to be done about it.
With all the prove that had been laid out, with all the facts that had been told as truth but now is just an obvious deceit, we are now, completely assured that this 9/11 case is an event that tells us how deep the hate of our enemies towards Muslim and to what extent they could react in order to achieving their goals to destroy us and humanities. It is now the time for us to stand up, unite ourselves to protect our most cherish belief. So the first step to do this is by urging the worldwide society and especially the American government to re-open the case of 9/11. The end
